Emos, committment, and teens...OH MY!!
Into the eternally leprous and macabre realm that is teen angst I venture. Every time I think I couldn't possibly be more disinclined to accept myself as one of them, they manage to not only prove me wrong, but to make me question my sanity as to why I doubted the inevitability of further disappointment. However, this post will not be dedicated to numbered paragraphs listing all the issues I see with teen hormones and "love" in today's society, but rant about the issue in general, incorporating past patterns and the intricacy of sociological epidemics known mainly as peer pressure and media manipulation.
It used to be in the grand old days that a boy and a girl did not become a "couple" for quite a long time. In those days, they didn't STUPIDLY misconstrue dating as being boyfriend and girlfriend. As a matter of fact, dating was seen as a way to find OUT whether they'd be a compatible couple, back when "first base" and "second base" actually existed. In those days, a boy or a girl had what was known as a "little black book," which would contain the phone numbers of ALL THE PEOPLE THEY WERE DATING. A boy could take out a different girl every weekend of the month, or even every saturday of the month, without ANY commitments. Holding hands was considered an advancement in the relationship, not a prerequisite. You worked your way UP to holding hands, not beginning with it. In recent days, nay, years, the little black book has ceased to exist. As Oscar Wilde so wisely stated it, "It seems in these times that all the married men are living like bachelors, and all the bachelors are living like married men." If this is unclear to you, it means two teenagers who act like they're in a monogamous marriage, although they are TEENS and not married! Young people today are so desperate to get involved in a "serious relationship," when the fact of the matter is that they're supposed to be exploring the field! When you get two people who have been monogamous with each other since they were16, they will not only have issues, but will deprive themselves of exploring other people in the world! If they commit themselvesto a single partner at an age when hormones dominate their conscious being, they will never have a point of comparison to what truly makes them happy. And in the same vein, when they start to have issues like a married couple, they will not know how to end the relationship or adequately resolve the issue, because they have not granted themselves the experience to maturely analyze a problem in a relationship.
I find it impossible to sympathize with teens who are having "relationship trouble." In my very Conservative opinion, you shouldn't be HAVING relationships. Sure, we all do anyway. I am not a stranger to a relationship, but it should not be treated as a marriage. There comes a point when rationality and logic MUST be allowed to make an appearance in the way you run your life. If you allow yourself to belong to a single person for the better part of your life, even if you KNOW that the issues you may have cannot be resolved, you're CRIPPLING yourself. And the WORST is when they get mad at their parters because they have to grow up. Do those people realize that they are asking their partner to inhibit the natural stages of development into adulthood? It is called having a life, and a "lover" (snort) you have at such a delicate age should not be a factor into how you're going to run your life. Your future comes first. And to you hopeless bleeding-heart romantics who just got pissed at that, do NOT try to tell me that "That special person IS my life." If that is true, then you have some serious growing up to do. Wake up and smell life, because you're sleep-walking through it and need to snap back to reality.
Sure, I understand why teens THINK they need their boyfriend/girlfriend. Being in a monogamous and committed relationship makes them feel special, important, a prominent figure in their "lover's" life. That is why it seems that those with the lowest self-esteems are in the most relationships in their younger year: It gives them a chance to feel good about themelves. Knowing that you mean so much to this other person, even if its only a shallow importance, gives them a feeling of self-worth, and a significance to their existence. But in regards to the above paragraph, when that relationship INEVITABLY ends, are they any better off for the experience? Or even more convinced of their own worthlessness? Does a whore feel better about their moral convictions after a night on the job? Or do they feel even dirtier for allowing themselves to be exploited again? True moral conviction stems from being able to stand up after a rough experience and say, "Okay, THAT didn't work. Time to move on." Moral conviction does not mean that you must bind yourself to a presupposed state of self-immolation, while all the while attempting to convince yourself that it's the right thing to do. When you enter a relationship purely for the sake of feeling better about yourself, it can ONLY end in pushing you further.
And then there are those who honestly think they "love" their partner. These people, I pity the least. These teenagers, who have completely surrendered all logic and rationality to "emotions" and "feelings" and all those other words that bring bile into my throat, draw no bliss tunes from attempting to pluck at my heartstrings. I have come to realize that if you have to learn to convince yourself over time that you do love a person, then you do not. It is the same concept in baseball for the hall of fame. If you even have to WONDE